The peasants are revolting
By Matt Cooney,
I’ve never seen Digg, the mondo community link-sharing site, quite as busy as it is right now. The Digg front page is full of stories that have been ‘dugg’ thousands of times, all of them including a short string of hexadecimal numbers that Digg has declared verboten. Today, Digg’s users are rebelling.
Digg’s publishers must be wondering what the hell is going on. Digg’s fanbase is usually fawning, but earlier today the site decided to delete stories that include a key that can be used to decrypt protected HD-DVD disks (this is apparently illegal in the US, where freedom of speech applies to people but perhaps not to software). That caused some unhappiness, but a user soon noticed that the HD-DVD Group sponsors a webcast produced by Digg’s founders and the revolt began. Digg users, who had bought in to the idea that Digg stories were entirely suggested and voted on by the user community, are not happy and they’re making their displeasure known the only way most of them know how—on Digg, of course.
It’s interesting to watch and, at the moment at least, Digg users seem to be able to post and vote on stories quicker than Digg management can remove them.
It’s not that long ago that an earlier news aggregation site with a technical slant, Slashdot, seemed to have a near-untouchable user community but when Slashdot stagnated many users quickly jumped ship to the easier-to-use Digg. Is Digg now running the risk that it might lose a large chunk of its audience? The controversy is just sending more traffic to Digg at the moment, but this would be a really good time for Digg to show it shares the concerns of its customers.
[Update: it does. Digg founder Kevin Rose has joined the revolt.]
Comments
Charlie
An interesting thing here is that Digg (the company) may very well have a real liability on their hands. So while the rebellion demonstrates the mobility of the community, it's possible that it will also damage the community…likely impact they implement tighter moderation to protect themselves, worst case scenario Digg gets sued out of existance (I doubt it).
The next Diggnation podcast sure will make for good listening.
Matt Cooney
Thanks Charlie. It's certainly possible, although I kinda think Digg has been forced to make a decision to go with its users and not try to control them. But I don't doubt the risk they're running by flouting the DMCA … perhaps they should move head office to Enzed where we don't have such stupid legislation. Yet, anyway.
I'm still amazed by what transpired at Digg yesterday and I'd love to think what other sites with user-generated content think about it (Amazon, YouTube, etc. Trade Me?) I'll have more to say about this in my weekly newsletter that comes out about … now …
Ben Kepes
It's an intensly interesting situation. Take the power of community that is a feature of the modern community more so than ever before, add a situation where a business faces the choices of losing that communities buy-in or facing a legal/financial threat and watch the sparks fly. It could be said that DIGG, by first censoring, and then self publishing, the code, did a double disservice to itself. True they were between a rock and a hard place but they not only alienated their community but brought themselves under the threat of legal action - double whammy!
Anonymous comments on this post are disabled. Please sign up to post a new comment.